Commentary

Two weeks ago we introduced readers to National Presto (NPK), a business with three well diversified segments and a very healthy dividend yield in the range of 8%.  Last week we dug into the houewares segment, and this week, we’re going to explore the absorbents business. Absorbents The absorbents business is a small but growing segment for National Presto.  It primarily produces private-label adult incontinence products.  Revenue for the absorbents segment is about half that of the housewares segment, and until recently, it’s been at best a break-even business.  However, in 2009 the segment generated a healthy profit, and that trend has continued into the first quarter.  By comparing the absorbents segment of NPK to the diaper segments of P&G and Kimberly-Clark, we might be able to get a better sense for what to expect in the future.  First, the financial statements for the NPK absorbents segment…

There’s been a lot of talk recently about Hungary following in Greece’s footsteps and potentially defaulting on its debt. Bulgaria and Romania are two other weak economies in Eastern Europe, and the chart below shows bank exposure by country to Bulgaria, Romania, Hungary and Greece…

Teen retailing can be a difficult business, and unpredictable for investment analysts who fear the fickle fashion trends of 16-year old girls. The recession turned the teen retail industry on its head, but this wasn’t necessarily bad news for all. Some retailers actually saw significant improvement in sales, some helplessly watched sales fall off a cliff, and some of the retailers with multiple brands targeting different price points weren’t impacted much at all. This is Economics 101, where we learned about how “inferior” goods such as Spam would see increased demand in a weak economy. Now that we have a sense for what store profitability looks like in both a strong and weak economy, we can better understand risk. And uncertainty in the market has created attractive opportunities across the board…

Last week we introduced readers to National Presto (NPK), a business with three well diversified segments and a very healthy dividend yield in the range of 8%.  This week, we’re going to dig into the housewares segment. Housewares National Presto has a valuable brand name.  In the chart below, we looked at the number of stars Presto products have earned in the Kitchen & Dining section of Amazon.com.  83% of Presto products have earned 4 stars or more, with only 1% (one product) earning one star.  We compared Presto to Black & Decker, George Foreman, t-fal, and Cuisinart.  The results are clear, Presto’s products are rated higher, on average, than their competitors…

Treasury Inflation Protected Securities are government issued securities adjusted bi-annually for inflation. When the urban consumer price index (CPI-U) increases, the face value and the yield on TIPS also increases. If investors are concerned about inflation, TIPS are one method of protection (you can buy them directly from the government here: http://www.treasurydirect.gov/indiv/products/prod_tips_glance.htm) given that they are directly tied to inflation. Unlike other investments which “should” appreciate in an inflationary environment, TIPS do appreciate…

National Presto Industries (NPK) operates three separate businesses, each somewhat straightforward to analyze: a housewares business, an absorbents (private label diaper) business, and a Department of Defense munitions supplier.  We originally looked at NPK when it was trading near the $130 range, but decided the stock was a little too expensive for us after a cursory analysis.  We set a price alert at $105 and put it on the back-burner.  When the price fell below our target last week, we resumed the research process.  Over the coming month, we’ll try to determine a fair valuation for each segment independently.  This analysis is being done real-time, meaning we’re not sure what conclusions we will draw from it.  We haven’t yet made an investment and we’re not sure if we will.  But the valuation appears reasonable, definitely worth taking a look at, and we hope that progressing through the research process with us will be an entertaining experience for our readers…

Imagine you’re choosing between investing in two start-up businesses.  Both will start with $10mm and invest in projects expected to generate a 15% return.  The only difference between these two companies is that one will invest in tangible factories and the other will invest in intangible R&D.  So far, you would be correct if you said these companies should be valued equivalently.  But would you be able to tell that these companies are equivalent by looking at their financial statements?  Let’s look at the first 5 years of two startups, starting with the factory builder…

Airlines have been, and will likely continue to be, a notoriously bad investment.  The industry is capital intensive, massively fragmented with hundreds of global players, heavily regulated, and unionized… with no real way for carriers to differentiate their services.  Bankruptcy courts keep carriers alive in a zombie like state allowing them to continually erode margins while regulators block mergers.  And on top of that, the industry attracts new entrants every few years despite low expectations for return.  There is absolutely no reason to expect any player in this industry to generate above average returns on invested capital. But within the industry, there are a number of players that have been able to consistently generate a reasonable return on invested capital, and at the right stock price, that’s all investors need.  In particular, regional airlines and airplane/engine lessors have generally been able to secure long-term contracts guaranteeing rates of return in the range of 3%, which when leveraged 4-5x yields a 12-15% return on equity.  At the moment, there are a number of players in both industries trading at unusual valuations.  In this report, we focus on the regional airline industry.  In the future we will also take a look at equipment lessors…

Every quarter, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac release a chart depicting the cumulative default rates by origination year.  This chart is usually hidden in the middle of the presentation, but it provides a tremendous amount of information about what's happening in the US housing market.  Below is the cumulative default rate chart from Freddie Mac at year end 2009…

In a report from the Milken Institute, the US was ranked 5^th out of 122 countries for providing an economic environment favorable to accessing global capital.  At a time when we're considering how best to regulate our banking and financial institutions, it might be interesting to take a closer look at these numbers to get a sense for how the US compares to other countries.  Living in New York, it's easy to believe Manhattan is the financial center of the universe.  But if that's the case, why did the Milken Institute determine that US entrepreneurs have less access to capital than their counterparts in Canada, Hong Kong, the UK and Singapore?  Why did L'Occitane, a major French cosmetics company, recently announce their IPO in Hong Kong instead of the US? For a brief overview of how the index is compiled, the process is fairly straightforward.  There are seven components to the index each with a number of variables.  For each variable, a country is scored and ranked into a decile, the average of which comprises the score for each component.  Each component is then weighted (25% for macroeconomics, 25% for the institutional environment, and 10% for each of an additional five categories) and averaged to determine the final score…

With the S&P up 75% from its March 9, 2009 market bottom, it's smart to take a step back from individual stock valuations to look at the market as a whole.  A good way to do that is with Robert Shiller's S&P 500 P/E data, which he used to predict the internet bubble of 2000 (weeks before it popped) in his book Irrational Exuberance.  His excel spreadsheet is regularly updated at http://www.econ.yale.edu/~shiller/data/ie_data.xls. His methodology is simple.  He compares the current price of the S&P 500 to the average index earnings per share of the composite companies over the past ten years.  The resulting product is a chart of how the P/E ratio has fluctuated since 1880…

In this post, we're going to profile The Cash Store Financial Services Inc., which trades as CSF on the Toronto Stock Exchange. Accounts managed by Kerrisdale currently hold CSF, and we may buy or sell shares at any time. We will not disclose our sale if and when we sell, and we will not necessarily disclose that we have changed our thesis if we discover something faulty with our analysis at a later date. Our PDF materials for CSF can be downloaded here. All figures in this email are in Canadian Dollars. Financials have not been updated for 3-31-10 figures released late last week. Although we own CSF, the main purpose of this post is to provide background information for our monthly investment writeup AUC. AUC is essentially a startup version of CSF in a new country where the payday lending market is a fraction of the size of Canada's. AUC management are former Canadian executives from CSF, and the business strategy is to simply export the successful Canadian business model to Australia. Understanding CSF's historical growth in Canada is integral to envisioning how AUC could grow in Australia…